Sequence patternSHL Verify G+Cubiks Logiks AdvancedPiCompany Connector

Recursive Acceleration

The gap between consecutive terms keeps growing — or shrinking — by a fixed rule.

Recursive Acceleration is one of the most common pattern types in SHL Verify G+ and Cubiks Logiks Advanced assessments. Instead of adding the same number each step (simple arithmetic), the differences themselves follow a pattern: they may double, triple, or increase by a fixed amount. Candidates who only check first-level differences will miss it entirely. Mastering this pattern can unlock five or six correct answers in a standard assessment session.

How to solve it

  1. 1Write out the differences between consecutive terms: d₁ = t₂ − t₁, d₂ = t₃ − t₂, and so on.
  2. 2If those differences are not constant, compute the differences of the differences (second layer).
  3. 3If the second-layer differences are constant (e.g. all +2) or multiply by a fixed ratio (e.g. all ×2), you have Recursive Acceleration.
  4. 4To find the next term: extend the pattern to get the next difference, then add it to the last term.
  5. 5Watch for both growing sequences (differences increasing) and shrinking sequences (differences decreasing).

Worked examples

Example 1

Classic doubling differences

3
7
15
31
63
?

Rule: Each difference doubles

3 → 7+4
7 → 15+8 (4 × 2)
15 → 31+16 (8 × 2)
31 → 63+32 (16 × 2)
63 → ?+64 (32 × 2)
Answer: 12763 + 64 = 127

Example 2

Differences increasing by 1

1
2
4
7
11
16
?

Rule: Each difference increases by 1

1 → 2+1
2 → 4+2 (1 + 1)
4 → 7+3 (2 + 1)
7 → 11+4 (3 + 1)
11 → 16+5 (4 + 1)
16 → ?+6 (5 + 1)
Answer: 2216 + 6 = 22

Example 3

Downward acceleration (shrinking faster)

50
48
44
38
30
?

Rule: Each difference grows by −2

50 → 48−2
48 → 44−4 (2 more negative)
44 → 38−6 (2 more negative)
38 → 30−8 (2 more negative)
30 → ?−10 (2 more negative)
Answer: 2030 − 10 = 20

Common mistakes

  • Stopping after the first layer of differences. If d₁, d₂, d₃... are not all the same, check whether they form a pattern of their own before giving up.
  • Assuming the next difference equals the previous difference (i.e. treating it as arithmetic). Always verify that the second-layer is truly constant.
  • Missing reversed sequences. A sequence like 64, 63, 61, 58, 54... decreases by growing gaps — still Recursive Acceleration.

Ready to practice?

Work through timed Recursive Acceleration questions and track your accuracy.

Other pattern types